Coercion or confidence

I was wondering today whether you can develop effective communication and engagement if you are in an agency responsible for enforcement? It followed an online discussion about the issue at the conference run by the Society of Evidence Based Policing.

The issue being considered was whether law enforcement activity fundamentally struggled because it was about coercion which could then undermine public confidence. I have to say this seems an odd position to take. Of course, the fact that people could face arrest, charge, conviction and prison when they meet the police is important. That said if you have done nothing wrong then why would you be concerned? 

Every organisation will face a time when they have to be both tough but also communicate and develop engagement on other matters. The conflict may be when something has gone wrong, or when they have to challenge things in a public way. There has to be a strong message but it doesn’t mean this should create a barrier. All these things can be achieved without sacrificing anything. The key has to be having a creative and focused approach to communication. 

There are times when the messaging has to be tough and there are times when it can have a soft edge. This is the way in the modern world. Having a brand and identity does not mean that you are rigidly stuck in being that same thing all the time. People will accept that organisations have different things to say and to deal with, and we should credit them with the ability to understand and deal with this.

It is up to companies and organisations to prioritise effective communication and engagement as a means by which to have a more reasoned discussion about the strong arm elements and also those softer things. Putting appropriate specialists with skills and experience in place should be part of the core of agencies if they really want to avoid any conflicting message, branding or imagery.

The police service does face a unique challenge where it must be part of the community but also hold people to account for criminal or antisocial activity. I know this creates challenges but it also provides opportunities to develop communication that can increase community confidence rather than damage it. At the heart is investing in the right communication support to mitigate any risks.

This entry was posted in #ayearinblogs, challenge, communication, creativity, crime, police, policing and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Coercion or confidence

  1. Paul Coffey says:

    I’m not party to the rationale of the conference organisers but, like you, this would appear to be a very odd subject to discuss. Clearly, one of the founding principles of policing in the UK is that officers exercise their powers to police with the implicit consent of the public.
    Policing in this country is therefore, built on a foundation of cooperation with the police … ‘the police are the public and the public are the police.’
    It is why the Police brand remains strong because, despite relatively recent issues such as Hillsborough, CSE, Plebgate etc, public confidence and trust in the police remains high.
    I would suggest there is nothing at all coercive about policing in the UK. The majority of people are law abiding citizens and in my experience their ‘relationship’ with the police is built around a respect for the job they do in keeping them safe but also an expectation that they will be there if needed.
    Police forces across the country have to deliver effective communication and engagement activity on a daily basis. In some ways that has been the case since Peel’s days – it’s just that we are now able to better distil the benefits (or disbenefits) of it.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s